March 28

1905, 1941


1905


The following essay (at this stage I am simply drafting its outlines, but the goal, eventually, is to turn it from a blog-page into a book) requires a date, and truthfully there isn't one, not a day, not a week, not a month, not even a year, and to some degree not even a century, because what I want to write about is something that takes many years to happen.

And for a title: "How waves on the ocean rise and rise, until they reach their absolute peak, and then, having nothing else to do, nowhere else to go, they crash".

Far too long-winded, I know. Then how about "The Culmination of European Civilisation"? But isn't the culmination of one epoch also the incipit of a new one?

Yes, the start of a new epoch is what I said, and meant; but self-evidently I also need to explain it. 1905 was the year in which European civilisation reached its culmination – not its end, because there are no ends to human civilisation, but the culmination of a specific phase of growth: the height of the wave. That phase started, let us say, in 1492 – there may be a more precise date, allowing for the Italian Renaissance in particular, but 1492 is the date I am choosing, because this was the year in which the most important ship of all European time was sailed into the Atlantic of the human intellect, and discovered the New World – the completion of Copernicus’ “De Rerum orbium celestis”. At that moment the power of the Catholic church began to wane, and especially its ability to force the human intellect to remain closed, to sustain an era of intellectual darkness that enabled it to operate its ideology of social control across most of the planet, and to reap the rewards of earthly wealth and power in the process.

Between 1492 and 1905, as we shall see, the human intellect (in Europe and to some degree its colonies, which was most of the rest of the planet) opened like a morning flower, petal by slow petal, until it reached its full bloom; and then, as every fully bloomed flower must, it wilted, and died, ready to be replaced by a new flower, blooming in its passing; and one which, like itself, must already have begun to bud in order to have been able to supplant its predecessor. The new bud is the ongoing proletarian revolution, whose first manifestation was in Russia, in 1905 – though it failed, as Copernicus did initially, to make the transformation, because transformations take time too, several hundred years indeed.

So we have a year, but we also need a precise date on which to place this essay in the blog, and for that it has to be an event that at once describes the achieving of the peak, but also defines what and how the new epoch would become, beyond the politics and economics of the proletarian revolution, through the most significant change that revolution would bring, the access for all people to genuine education, and thereby a release from vassaldom and state or church control. So something that was neither mythological nor metaphysical, but exclusively phenomenological, epistemological - and other than Einstein’s four seminal papers, all published that year, few events seemed to me more symbolically precise.

So I looked up March 28 in the history almanacs, to see if I could justify my choice, so to speak, of day M rather than week E or month C (they all proved equal, once squared), and lo and behold "March 28 1905:
Albert Einstein submitted a paper to the journal 'Annalen der Physik' that explained the photoelectric effect by proposing that light could behave as a particle (a 'quantum' of energy), a concept that became a cornerstone of quantum theory." The fourth paper, the culmination of his life's work, the final vincdication of Copernicus, the start of modern science. Perfection!

Now all I have to do is write the essay!




1941


The rose garden at Sissinghurst, now a National Trust property, formerly the home, the horticultural achievement, of Victoria Mary (Vita) Sackville-Westborn March 9 1892; died June 2 1962.

Victoria Mary, Lady Nicolson CH (that's "Companion of Honour") is how she probably ought to be known, but common-or-garden Vita Sackville-West was her preference: English novelist, poet, housescape designer, journalist, letter writer and diarist, though not necessarily in that order every day.

Hubby was
the politician Harold Nicholson (whose diaries can be found here); their son was Benedict, usually shortened to Ben Nicholson (bio here) though it also needs pointing out that this was Benedict, editor of "The Burlington" magazine and art historian, not Benedict, husband of Barbara Hepworth and modernist painter, who was not, as far as I am aware, a relation.

A dozen novels (click here for the biblio), a dozen collections of poetry, plus journalism, letters by the hundred, diaries - but what brings me to her, and her to this page, is not simply the glory of her back garden; several actually (click
here), because she made a new one every time she moved - and if gardening were counted among the great art-forms as it should be, she would be regarded as the Turner of her day - though Sissinghurst (here) and Knole (here) are the two that matter.

Now I am a life-long admirer of Adeline Virginia Stephen (Virginia Woolf by her married name), having read "Orlando" as a teenager and been so completely mesmerised by it that I devoured "Mrs Dalloway" and Jacob's Room" with equal passion straight away, then "To The Lighthouse" and "The Waves" with even more, but slower, over several years, because they are much more richly complex, and returned to her again and again down the years, "A Room Of One's Own" massively influential as a starting-point for what has now become "Woman-Blindness", and her comments about Elizabeth Barrett Browning's "Aurora Leigh" one of the key incipits for my "Book of Joan"... but it was only when I went digging into the equally but differently extraordinary VSW (I wonder if that similarity of initials was one of their initial attractions) that I learned that... but let me tell the whole tale.

They met at someone's dinner party in 1922, and became intellectual friends at once. Somewhere around 1925 they moved from the library to the bedroom, and when they were apart went back to their separate libraries to write their extensive correspondence and, in 
Woolf 's case, extensive diary as well. But the real love-letter was "Orlando", and the original manuscript, viewable if you visit Knole (click here), is inscribed "Vita from Virginia". They finally left the bedroom in 1935, confining their friendship to the library, occasionally the garden, until Ginia's death, today in 1941.

 

 


 



February 25

1756




When my kids were growing up, because it was a fun way of filling up the emptiness of a long car journey, or a means of making that boring activity a visit to an art gallery or museum a little less boring, we played a game I had invented called "Spot The Derivative". Switch on Radio 3 and whatever happens to be playing is... they were both doing music at school, one learning violin, the other wind instruments, and both a little bit of piano, so the background was there. "Sounds like late Romantic" or "has to be Mozart" might even turn into, "no, I know that, one of my friends did it for her GCSE solo, that's Chopin." Or recognising the use of light in a Rembrandt because we had been to the Caravaggio exhibition the week before. Or my elder daughter, telephoning me one day in Toronto, because she was in Reading with her mum and Jane Austen was the next author on her A level syllabus. "I need something that will get me an A-grade dad, something different from the standard essay everybody's going to write." Which book, I asked her? "Sense and Sensibility".

So we talked about 
Charlotte Turner Smith and the "School of Sensibility", which gave Wordsworth and Coleridge their "Lyrical Ballads", but also Jane Austen her title (see Oct 28), and mentioned, because it would make a good footnote, that "Pride and Prejudice" was likewise "borrowed", from Dr Lyster in Fanny Burney's "Cecilia" (see June 13); and then I sent her off to do some research into Maria Edgeworth, probably the authoress who had the greatest impact on Jane (see Jan 1).

Three days later she called again, wanting more. So we talked about the play at the heart of "Mansfield Park", which
Jane had basically "lifted" from Elizabeth Inchbald's "Lovers' Vows" (see Oct 15), and then about Elizabeth Inchbald, who made her stage-name in a production of the same play, though not in Jane Austen's production (ditto Oct 15).

But that was "Mansfield Park", and she was studying "Sense and Sensibility", and so we talked about
Eliza Haywood, Elizabeth Fowler her birthname, born somewhere around 1693, and on this page because she died today, in 1756: an actress to begin with - at the Smock Alley Theatre in Dublin around 1714, then in London from 1717 - but mostly a writer, very much of the hot passion genre in her novels, though intermingled, indeed closely coupled with social and political commentary (Alexander Pope detested her, and it was probably just envy of her skills); there were plays too, articles in periodicals, poetry, translations - she even became a publisher, founding and editing “The Female Spectator” 
(here and here) - and spot the derivative of that title!

But enough. As one who believes in autodidacticism, the importance of discovering knowledge for oneself, I recommended my daughter to the
Jane Austen Society's website, which states unequivocally that

"Austen’s cyclical Eliza narratives in "Sense and Sensibility" owe a debt to the earlier highly patterned amatory plots of her predecessor Haywood, and each of Austen’s novels encodes and gestures towards the sort of seduction narratives that generated Haywood’s initial rise to fame."

Spot the derivative! You can read her full biography, and get the same A-grade that my daughter got, here.

Oh, and while you're pursuing the subject, you might want to look up the other two ladies in the picture at the top: left to right 
Fanny BurneyEliza HaywoodJane CollierJane Austen and Sarah Scott. Start here, which is where I found the picture.


 


You can find David Prashker at:
http://theargamanpress.com/

http://davidprashker.com/ 
http://davidprashker.net/ 
https://www.facebook.com/TheArgamanPress 
http://davidprashkersprivatecollection.blogspot.com 
http://davidprashkerssongsandpoems.blogspot.com 
http://davidprashkersartgallery.blogspot.com 
http://davidprashkersworldhourglass.blogspot.co.uk/ 
http://thebiblenet.blogspot.co.uk/




Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press


June 14

1829


Therese, or probably Theresa Heyne, known by her married name as Therese Huber, born in Göttingen on May 7 1764, daughter of the classical philologist Christian Gottlob Heyne; died in Augsburg on the night of June 14/15 1829. She was one of the so-called Universitätsmamsellen, five daughters of academics at Göttingen University who would probably have got professoress-ships themselves in today’s world, but... the others were Meta Forkel-Liebeskind, Caroline Schelling, Philippine Engelhard and Dorothea Schlözer: more on them here.

She became the first woman editor of a major literary journal - though she did so anonymously for many years, because women in Deutschland at that time were supposed to manage family homes, not newspapers - and wrote many novels in which the women sort of did but really didn't quite conform to the stereotype just described. Her obituary was written by no less a person
than Wilhelm von Humboldt, so clearly her intellectual credentials were in tact.

But enough of bio (though if you insist on more, try here); what should matter to posterity is that she was one of the most prolific writers of late 18th- and early 19th-century Germany, publishing more than sixty stories, six novels, almost four thousand letters, and translating several works from French and English into German - all that in addition to her journalism. From 1816 to 1823 she edited the "popular" German newspaper, “Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände” (“Morning Daily for the Cultured Classes”), a paper whose title suggests that it probably wasn’t an equivalent of The Sun, The Mirror or The Mail, so “popular”, not “populist”.

Growing up in such an intellectual home, and with four such educated friends, was obviously an advantage, but getting the husband right can help too. Her first, named Georg, was the son of the naturalist Johann Reinhold Forster, and had travelled as his dad’s personal assistant on James Cook's second voyage around the world (1772–75) - that’s him on the left, with dad in New Zealand, the portrait viewable at Australia’s National Portrait Gallery, or online with more info about the importance of the work they did, here. Georgs part-science part-travelogue account of the voyage of The Resolution sold more copies than any of Theresa’s. Apparently Theresa didn’t mind.

 And now I do need to return to biography, because, in 1801, she published a best-seller of her own, the first novel in world literature set in an Australian penal settlement. I wonder where she got her information? Entitled “Adventures on a Journey to New Holland”, it tells the story of people who got caught up in the aftermath of the French Revolution, which is also a funny coincidence, because both she and Georg were such ardent supporters of the French Revolution, they had been forced to leave their home in Mainz for Neufchâtel in Switzerland in 1792, when it became clear that they would come under personal threat from Prussian troops advancing to free Mainz from the French army.

“Adventures on a Journey to New Holland” is unsurprisingly vague about Australia, relying as it did on
Georg’s brief visit, and not having him him around any longer to add more from memory - he died in 1794. Nevertheless she produced a sequel, “The Lonely Deathbed”, in 1810.

But I have jumped ahead: she and
Georg had left for Switzerland in 1792, and Georg, as noted, died two years later. With them had fled a close friend, a Saxon diplomat named Ludwig Ferdinand Huber. The couple married, but he had no source of income save a few savings, and so she needed to earn for the two of them from her writing. The novel “Die Familie Seldorf”, with the French Revolution as its central theme, occupied 1795 and 1796; but Huber died in 1804, and “The Lonely Deathbed” was rather more a matter of financial necessity than the extension of literary investigation. She is remembered today as Germany's first professional woman writer.

 

 

 

You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press

March 7

1274 


The death of Tomás Aquino, mentioned in Canto 20 of Dante's "Purgatorio", where I discover from Longfellow's footnote 288 that:

"Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor of the Schools, died at the convent of Fossa Nuova in the Campagna, being on his way to the Council of Lyons, in 1274. He is supposed to have been poisoned by his physician, at the instigation of Charles of Anjou."


Now that is definitely worth following up on some future occasion.




You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press

March 14

1991


"The Birmingham Six", Hugh Callaghan, Paddy Hill, Gerry Hunter, Richard McIlkenny,  William Power and John Walker, released from prison today; Chris Mullin, the journalist whose investigation of police corruption led to their release, is in the photo below (and at the link where I found it - click here. The full tale is told at the same link.




You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press

March 22

There are days in history which might well not have been, at least for those of us who record history on the universal, or even on the local scale.



The founding of the English Football League in 1888 is not going to gain my interest.

The release of The Beatles' first album "Please Please Me" in 1963 is even less likely.

The first movie screening by the Lumière brothers in 1895 could merit a quick google-surf, but maybe on another occasion.

As to the United States passing the Beer and Wine Revenue Act in 1933, I shall simply post a link to Dave Van Ronk singing Moonshiner (click here).

But apparently World Water Day is thirstily observed on this date in the calendar (but was skipped in 1903 at Niagara Falls, because - hard to imagine it I know, but true for all that - they temporarily ran out of water due to a drought). Click here

And in 1784 the Emerald Buddha was moved with great ceremony to its current location in Wat Phra Kaew, Thailand: moved from where, and why, and why to here, and why is this so important? I have no idea.


Apparently my next-door-neighbour's great-aunt died on this date in, I forget which year she told me, and I know for certain that this was the day, in 1994, when my cousin Jackie gave birth to her first child... so clearly this day does count as historic, at least for some people.






You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press



March 24

Amber page




Southern African Liberation Day, and click
here for one of the reasons why.


But it was also the day on which the PFA, the "Party of the African Federation" was established in West Africa, then ruled by the French, in 1959 - the achievement of poet-turned-politician Léopold Sédar Senghor, the same man who became the first head of state when Mali gained independence from France on June 20 1960.


The map shows the political geography of southern Africa in 1812, right at the start of European conquest.





You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2018/2024 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press

March 18

1871



The Paris Commune.

Not to be confused with the Paris Commune of 1789-1795, which was the official name of the Revolutionary government after the fall of the Bastille, and the reason why this uprising was named as it was. For the first version see, for example, Reine Audu on Oct 5.

The fall of this Paris Commune can be found, alas, on May 28Trotsky's thoughts about it are on Aug 20.

Of the other keyplayers, André Léo can be found on June 17, but I am focusing here on three very remarkable women:


Adèle Paulina Mekarska, though she went by the nom de révolution of Paule Mink, or sometimes Minck. Thirty-two when the Franco-Prussian war ended in defeat and embarrassment, and the oppressed and starving workers of the capital decided that assez had become genug (she was born, of Polish descent but in France, on November 9 1839, and died on April 18 1901), she was already well-known as a revolutionary socialist and an even more revolutionary feminist, having joined André Léo's "Société pour la Revendication du Droit des Femmes" in the 1860s; her fame mostly from her published writings, on both themes: she had, for example, spent a year in Algeria, an official tour with an official title: "Anti-Imperialist and Anti-Clerical": so impactful was it on local Algerians, both "pied-noirs" and indigènes, that two Christian missionaries wrote their own book in dismay and consternation: "En zigzag du Maroc à Malte : à travers l'Algérie, la Tunisie et les états barbaresques : souvenirs d'Afrique External".


For more bio, and a detailed account of her role in the Paris Commune, click here (English) and-or here (French); a more scholarly-academic appraisal 
here, if you are able to access it


*


Louise Michel (1830-1905) known as “The Red Virgin”; an ideologue of anarchism (anarchism, not anarchy, those two are very different), she fought for the liberation of many other groups besides French women, including the indigenous Kanak people of New Caledonia (why them? see below) when they raised a revolution in hopes of independence from France, and for the Algerians in their similar cause later on.

The key positive date in her life was obviously today, which is why she is posted here. The key negative date was August 8 1873: imprisoned for twenty months for her part in the Commune, she was loaded onto the ship Virginie to begin a four-month sea-voyage to New Caledonia, where she remained until all those involved in t
he Commune were amnestied in 1880.

Returned to Paris, she resumed her commitment to a better world for those born without wealth or power, setting up her own newspaper, "La Vengeance Anarchiste", in March 1883, and then leading a demonstration of unemployed workers to demand jobs or at least social benefits. Arrested for doing so, this time she was sentenced to six years, all of it to be in solitary confinement to prevent her passing on her evil and wicked thoughts to others. When they let her out early, in 1886, she found the paper for whom she now wrote banned just weeks later, and herself arrested yet again - sent to an insane asylum this time, which quickly decided that she wasn't, and let her go. To England for five years, where she established a school that was much more about educating than about teaching; and then back to France, to die of pneumonia in Marseille on January 10 1905. And if you think of anarchists as solitaries and go-it-aloners who don't go in for crowds, you might be surprised to learn that her funeral in Paris was attended by more than 100,000 people.

I did once hear a French woman suggesting that the authorities were planning to rename Mont St Michel after her, but I think she was probably being ironic.


Her memoir “The Red Virgin” in translation here; bio here


*

And last, but really she ought to be first, 
Élisabeth Dmitrieff, principal organiser of the Paris Commune and a close friend of Karl Marx, who she knew in London, and who sent her to Paris as the official envoy of the International. Her birthname, on November 1 1850 in Saint-Petersburg, was Elizaveta Lukinichna Kusheleva; and her goal was rather more a Russian revolution than one anywhere else, but Russia wasn't ready, so she went under her nom-de-guerre to Paris, aged just twenty, and organised the women's involvement in the Paris Commune instead...

and I promise that I will write a full piece about her, but not today. In the meanwhile lots available online, of which I recommend this in particular, this especially, and this one just as much.

She died on February 23 1919 in Moscow.


*


Also in Amber:


Wilfred Edward Salter Owen, born today in 1893





You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press

September 7

Amber page


Good 
Queen Bess, born today in 1533, at what was then Greenwich Palace, but most of it got demolished after the Civil War, and then rebuilt as the Old Royal Naval College, designed by Christopher Wren, around 1690; you can still see some of the Tudor remains in the cellars.


Brazil declared independence from Portugal, today in 1822


The first world heavyweight championship under Queensberry Rules took place today in 1892; apparently Gentleman Jim Corbett defeated John L Sullivan, though whether on points or by knock-out I have not taken the trouble to find out


The Peace of Peking, or Bei-Jing as we are now told to pronounce it, signed in 1901, bringing to an end that other heavyweight bout, the Boxer uprising


The "blitz" started, today in 
1940

 

And finally, and this really will require further investigation, though it is unlikely to be verifiable: according to a calendar note in the BBC History magazine, “3466 bc: End of the Great Flood - according to the 19th century Leipzig philologist Gustav Seyffarth.”

Everything you could possibly be totally disinterested in about Seyffarth can be found here; for our subject, take him to be part of the same school that alma matered Gesenius and the Bible Critics.

But the subject here is the precise precision of that date, and you cannot deduce it in the solar calendar because it is computed biblically in the lunar, and times of that period are famously magnified.

Genesis 7:24 tells us “the waters prevailed upon the earth 150 days”, but gives no starting date. Archaeologists of Hittite Ararat, and mythological speculators like 
Robert Graves, have tried to demonstrate that the Flood story was simply a Creation myth, a means of explaining the laws of science before Physics, Chemistry and Biology had been invented; the flood analogising the breaking of the waters when a woman gives birth, the tale pseudo-historicising a full solar year from God first calling Noah to build the Ark until the setting of the rainbow in the sky. This would make a date around September logical, because the Jewish New Year falls at this time. But how does Seyffarth compute the 7th of September specifically? Perhaps Rosh ha-Shana fell on that date in the year that he made his calculations, and he did not realise that lunar dates perambulate across the solar calendar? And as to the year itself (I am ignoring the BBC's usage of "bc" instead of BCE) - 3446. This is achieved, I guess, by counting the ages of known men backwards from the date of Christ, a method equally as preposterous as the Jewish one of counting forwards from the date of Adam (which itself would anyway put the New Year five days out!)



You can find David Prashker at:


Copyright © 2018/2025 David Prashker
All rights reserved
The Argaman Press